Egg Donor Mental Health: What a 2025 Study of 363 Donors Reveals About the Long-Term Experience
Most clinic advertisements describe egg donation as straightforward. A few weeks of injections, a retrieval, a generous outcome, done. For plenty of donors, that's basically how it goes.
But egg donor mental health turns out to be more complicated than the dominant narrative suggests, and a January 2025 study published in Fertility and Sterility puts numbers behind what donors experience. The researchers surveyed 363 women who had donated eggs and looked at their long-term outcomes. The average donor in this sample had donated nearly 14 years before the survey. Sixty percent had donated more than a decade earlier. This is likely the longest postdonation follow-up of US oocyte donors to date.
Most participants said the experience was positive overall. A meaningful number also reported depression at rates nearly triple the national average, untreated procedural pain, fertility changes nobody warned them about, and clinics that disappeared after retrieval. An interesting dichotomy; however, both of those things are true at once.
Inside the Study: 363 Donors, Mixed-Methods Design
Donors were recruited primarily through the Donor Sibling Registry and four egg donor Facebook groups. Sample skewed older than the typical donating-age cohort because the design was retrospective. 77.1% of donations were nonidentified. Most donors (75%) had donated multiple times.
What Donors Actually Reported
89.5% of donors reported a positive overall experience.
23.2% self-reported a diagnosis of depression. The national female prevalence is 8.7%. That gap is statistically significant.
25.8% self-reported anxiety. That rate is comparable to national female prevalence (23.4%) but still clinically meaningful.
On validated PROMIS measures of current symptoms (past 7 days), 25.1% scored mild or greater for anxiety and 17.6% scored mild or greater for depression.
41.4% reported procedural pain, with an average rating of 6.68 out of 10. Of those, 92.5% described the pain as moderate or severe.
10.5% reported ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.
21% reported changes to menstrual cycle, ovulation, or fertility after donation. Among those, irregular menses (34%) and painful or heavy bleeding (42%) were most common.
11.5% screened positive for clinically significant alcohol or drug misuse on the CAGE-AID. Half of that group also reported depression. The national rate of alcohol use disorder among adult women is 4.1%.
94.3% of donors said clinics never contacted them for medical updates after donation, even though 25% had health changes they wanted to report.
Only 37.4% received counseling about potential fertility impact before donating. Of the 62.6% who didn't, more than half were under 40 at the time of the survey.
Why the "Anonymity" Finding Matters
When donors with regret were asked why, 45% pointed to nondisclosure. Among donors who reported emotional distress, 32% cited nondisclosure as the cause. The most common open-ended themes across the entire survey were the desire for better post-donation communication, less restrictive disclosure policies, and more information about long-term health.
Important disclosure: this sample was recruited largely through the Donor Sibling Registry, which means it's skewed toward donors who actively wanted to connect with offspring. The finding may not generalize to every donor. But it's consistent with a broader shift in the field toward identity-release and openness, particularly given research linking earlier disclosure with better long-term wellbeing for donor-conceived people.
What This Means If You're Considering Egg Donation
Most donors who completed this study said they were glad they did it.
It's also true that a real percentage end up with mental health symptoms, fertility concerns, or regret tied to nondisclosure, and the system has not done a strong job of supporting them on the back end.
A few things to keep in mind if you're thinking about donating:
The emotional experience isn't always linear. Donors describe pride and meaning sitting next to grief, hormonal shifts, sadness, or distress they didn't expect. None of that means anything went wrong. It means donation is a real medical and emotional event.
A history of anxiety or depression doesn't automatically rule you out. It does mean you deserve a thorough psychological evaluation and a plan for support afterward, not a rushed clearance.
Ask the clinic and agency how they handle post-donation care. Ask whether you'll have access to a therapist familiar with third-party reproduction. Ask about the disclosure model. Donors who donated multiple times reported significantly better experiences, which suggests communication and continuity matter.
If you're an intended parent, this study is a quiet reminder that your donor is a person, and her wellbeing extends past the cycle. Choosing a program that takes screening and follow-up seriously is part of doing this ethically.
Why Egg Donor Mental Health Screening Actually Matters
Psychological evaluations for egg donors are sometimes treated as a checkbox. ASRM requires it, the agency schedules it, the donor shows up, the evaluator clears her, everyone moves on.
This study is a strong argument for slowing that down.
A real evaluation does a few things at once. It identifies donors at higher risk for depression, anxiety, or substance use complications before the cycle starts. It gives the donor a confidential space to actually think through her motivations, her partner's involvement, what she'll tell future children, and how she'll feel knowing biological children may exist whom she won't parent. It sets a baseline so if something shifts after retrieval, somebody notices.
That's the work I do across my evaluation practice. Done well, it benefits the donor, the intended parents, and the clinic.
What This Study Cannot Tell Us
Worth being honest about the limits.
The sample was self-selected through an online survey, which always skews toward people who feel strongly enough to respond. Recruitment through the Donor Sibling Registry biases the sample toward donors who wanted contact with offspring, so the anonymity-related findings may not generalize. Several diagnoses were self-reported, which isn't the same as a clinician confirming them. The sample was 92.8% White, so racial and ethnic generalizability is limited. The design is cross-sectional, so it captures one snapshot rather than tracking change over time. And it cannot tell us whether donation caused the depression, anxiety, or fertility outcomes; only that those rates appeared in this group.
What it does is sharpen the conversation. Long-term, prospective, longitudinal studies with proper clinical assessments are still needed.
Closing
If you've donated eggs and you're feeling something you can't quite name (sadness, anxiety, numbness, pride, relief, all of it stacked on top of each other), you're not unusual. The data confirms it.
The job, both for the field and for individual donors, is to take the mental health side of donation as seriously as the medical side. Real screening before, real support after, and a therapist who knows what reproductive medicine actually looks like. If that hasn't been part of your experience yet, it can still be.
Explore more topics in Infertility and IVF or Schedule a Consultation.
